Agrability Project (logo) Agrability Project

Home

State AgrAbility Projects

AgrAbility Quarterly

Assistive Technology Resources

Assistive Technology Database

Resources

National AgrAbility Workshop (2001 - 2008)

Archive

Contact Us

AgrAbility Site Search


Forgotten username or password,
contact us.

Get Acrobat Reader

Download PowerPoint Viewer
(Windows only)

Site Translation Help
(Ayuda para traducción de sitios)

Proper Seating and Positioning for Tractor Operators Affected by Spinal Cord Injuries

Topics:

Introduction
Proper Positioning
Pressure relief and the tractor seat
Summary
Resources
References

Introduction

In order to reduce the risk of secondary injury and increase the ability to operate a tractor effectively, farmers/ranchers affected by Spinal Cord Injuries (SCI) must have the proper seating system and be properly positioned in it. For many farmers/ranchers with an SCI, their tractor becomes their primary workstation and command center. Such tasks as fieldwork, livestock feeding, and operations oversight often occur while the farmer/rancher is in the tractor seat, sometimes for hours at a time. Rough terrain, equipment vibration, long periods of sitting, upper body twisting (in order to see behind the tractor), and improper choice of seat and positioning can contribute to pressure ulcers (sidebar), back pain, and increased spasticity.

Tractors equipped with heat, air conditioning, a cell phone or FM radio communication system, and an independent suspension seat are essential for an operator with SCI. The operator’s correct positioning in the tractor seat is critical in maximizing his/her ability to control the tractor and prevent pressure ulcers from occurring. In a study completed at the University of Pittsburgh, 21 farmers with SCI were surveyed. 12 reported having a pressure ulcer (Willkomm, 1997 p. 38). Preventing the development of pressure ulcers is crucial, because they can be life threatening and take months to heal. The average cost of treating a pressure ulcer ranges from $15,000 to $61,000 (Cook & Hussey, 1995, p. 278).

Postural alignment and pressure management must be considered when modifying or adjusting existing tractor seats for the operator with SCI. Although the level of SCI will determine specific seating adaptations that a farmer/rancher may need, a number of general principles should be considered when adapting tractors for use by farmers/ranchers with SCI.

[Back to Top]

1. Proper positioning

The operator’s proper postural alignment in the tractor seat should be addressed first. Improper (asymmetric) pelvic alignment will increase pressure and shear forces (sidebar) (Cook & Hussey, 1995, p. 285; Trefler, Hobson, Johnson Taylor, Monahan, & Shaw., 1993, p. 167). Proper positioning in the tractor seat can reduce the operator’s potential for pressure ulcers, increase ability to operate tractor controls, provide needed stability, and reduce sliding in the tractor seat. Following a spinal cord injury, a farmer/rancher may have abnormal muscle tones and reflexes resulting in spasticity in the lower extremities. Leg spasms may result in the operator bumping and bruising his/her legs by inadvertently hitting the steering wheel, foot controls, or hand controls. Proper positioning in the tractor seat can help to reduce injuries from leg spasms. The following issues and equipment should be considered when attempting to achieve the optimal seating position to stabilize the operator’s pelvis and reduce his/her leg spasticity and injurious pressures on his/her body: seat-to-back angle, seat-incline angle, armrest position, foot placement, lumbar support, lateral support, lap belts, and securement straps.

  • A color photo shows an operator sitting with his seatback reclined fifteen degrees from vertical.
    Figure 1. Seat to back angle: An angle of 15° to 20° helps stabilize the operator's trunk

    Seat to back angle: A lap belt is frequently recommended to help an operator maintain a neutral pelvic position while seated in the tractor. It is also recommended that the seat-to-back angle be adjusted with the back being reclined approximately 15° to help stabilize the operator’s trunk and prevent forward loss of balance (see Figure 1). Reclining the backrest to 20° is usually recommended for wheelchair users with quadriplegia (Cook & Hussey, 1995, p. 298). An increased seat-to-back angle can also reduce the vertical reaction force at the seat base (Wilder, Magnussen, Fenwick, & Pope , 1994, p. 73).
  • Seat incline angle: “A slight incline of the seat prevents the buttocks from sliding forward and provides trunk stability” (Trefler et al., 1993, p. 167). Tractor seats are often equipped with this adjustment. If this option is not available, several wheelchair seat cushions are designed with an incline to perform this same function.
  • A color photo shows an operator seated with two positioning belts in place.   One belt is a standard seat belt at an angle of forty-five degrees.  The other belt is a ninety-degree lap belt that crosses the operator’s lap at mid-thigh.
    Figure 2. Belts: Pelvic positioning belts applied at 45° and 90° can help the operator maintain stability and function while sitting in the tractor seat.

    Belts: Pelvic positioning belts applied at 45° and 90° (relative to the thighs) can help the operator maintain stability and function while sitting in the tractor seat (see Figure 2). Tractor seatbelts can usually be secured at a 45° angle. To secure a lap belt at a 90° angle, however, would require customizing how the belt is installed. Lap belts that hold the legs together to prevent spasticity or potential leg injuries due to spasticity can also provide additional seat stability. Proper care should be taken to ensure that any positioning belts used by a tractor operator do not lead to the development of a pressure ulcer caused by frictional forces that can occur during tractor operations. The SubASIS bars (sidebar) or rigid lateral supports used with wheelchairs have not been seen with tractors (Willkomm, 1997). This equipment has not yet been tested in tractor operations during which the operator’s vertical movement can be significant. A rigid lateral support could contribute to an increase in shear forces to the operator’s trunk. Thoracic (sidebar) and lateral supports can also interfere with functional activities and are, therefore, to be avoided (Trefler et al., 1993, p. 177).
  • Armrest adjustments: The position of the armrests should be slightly above the operator’s elbow height when seated (Hansson, 1991, p. 14). If this cannot be achieved with the stock equipment, then the armrests should be modified. Armrests that are too low promote an asymmetrical posture and armrests that are too high may lead to shoulder or neck pain (Cook & Hussey, 1995, p. 299). If a seat cushion is added to the tractor’s operator seat, it may raise the position of the operator in the tractor’s operator seat. Therefore, the armrests will need to be adjusted accordingly.
  • Foot placement: Foot placement is critical in achieving postural stability and good circulation in order to help prevent a potential pressure ulcer. A footrest may need to be added in front of the tractor seat so that the operator’s thighs are horizontal. “Footrests that are too low will increase pressure under the thigh and encourage sacral (sidebar) sitting. Footrests that are too high will cause an undue amount of pressure on the ischial tuberosities” (sidebar) (Fergusson-Pell, 1990, p. 51). Ischial tuberosities are the two bony prominences on the bottom of the buttocks. A footrest can be a piece of wood or rigid insulation (pink board) stacked, wrapped, and fastened to the floor with non-slip material.
  • Lumbar support: A lumbar (sidebar) pad placed behind the back can help to decrease six areas of pressure, including pressure on the ischial tuberosities (Shields & Cook, 1988, p. 168). An existing tractor seatback rest may have a fixed lumbar support installed in it. If the seatback does not and it is removed and a customized seatback with lumbar supports is constructed, remember that it may affect co-workers’ use of the seat. When making any machinery modifications, it is always important to consider how they will affect all operators.
  • Lateral supports: If the operator has difficulty maintaining a midline position (side to side) of the trunk, then a lateral support is needed (Cook & Hussey, 1995, p. 266). How these supports are positioned depends on how much upper body control the operator has. Operators with high-level SCI may require more lateral support. Traditional lateral supports used in a wheelchair may not be appropriate in a tractor. Lateral support in a tractor seat can be achieved through proper seat selection, adjustments and modifications to the armrests, and the use of flexible positioning belts that will “give a little” while the tractor is moving over rough terrain (Willkomm, 1997a).
  • Securement straps: Operators with SCI frequently report lower extremity spasticity resulting in the need for securement straps for their legs. These straps can prevent the legs from inadvertently moving forward underneath the clutch and brake controls. In addition, securement straps can help prevent the operator from sliding forward out of the seat during a leg spasm. An additional (padded) seat belt may be needed to secure the operator’s pelvis. Operators with high-level SCI have also reported the use of a chest strap. A chest strap that is too secure and too tight, however, can cause a potential injury when the tractor hits a bump. A chest strap could cause friction and rubbing leading to a potential pressure ulcer. One farmer with a high-level SCI was observed using a rubber chest strap that was secured to the two corners of the back of the cab. This solution provided the operator with some support as he leaned forward to grab the controls and enabled him to more easily settle back into the seat. Another operator used a loose chest strap that was padded with sheepskin material (Willkomm, 1997a).
  • Hip, knee, and ankle angles: Each operator’s positioning needs are different. It may be helpful to start with measurements taken from the operator’s position in his/her wheelchair and use them to achieve similar positioning in the tractor seat. The position needed to operate the tractor controls effectively, however, differs slightly from the wheelchair positioning measurements. For example, to achieve optimum pressure distribution in a wheelchair, the pelvic/hip angle, knee flexion, and ankle flexion should be approximately 90° (Trefler et al., 1993, p. 156). In anthropometric (sidebar) studies of 21 tractor operators with SCI, 90° angles were not achieved in the tractor’s operator seat for any of the farmers/ranchers. In fact, a pelvic/hip angle that less than 90° is often preferred because it helps prevent the operator from sliding out of the tractor seat (Willkomm, 1997a).

[Back to Top]

2. Pressure relief and the tractor seat

An operator should perform a pressure relief every 10 to 15 minutes for at least 5 seconds (Trefler et al., 1993, p. 175). It can be performed by leaning forward in the tractor seat with forearms resting on the thighs or alternately by rocking to one side. The steering wheel, armrest, or control panel can be used when doing a pressure relief but this may result in cracked casing around the control panel, broken tractor seat arm rests, and a broken tilt mechanism on the tractor steering column. Although some operators have used an overhead grab bar when performing a pressure relief, this grab bar could potentially cause a head injury if clearance is insufficient (Willkomm, 1997a).

In addition to pressure relief activities, operators with SCI have used a variety of wheelchair cushions to prevent pressure ulcers. These cushions prevent the development of pressure ulcers through their unique design properties including: shock absorption, ventilation, load distribution, product integrity and stability, and ability to stabilize the pelvis and legs. The following are a few examples of cushions that have been used in the tractor seat for pressure management.

  • Flotation cushions (e.g., the Roho® cushion) have individual air cells to allow air circulation. Although a flotation cushion is excellent in allowing for changes in seat pressure, seating stability is reduced (Cook & Hussey, 1995, p. 287). This compromise can be a concern when operating the tractor over rough terrain. Seat stability is important in order to maintain seat balance and safe control of the tractor. Therefore, with this type of cushion, additional support may be needed to maintain stability.
  • Combination cushions (“hybrids,” e.g., the Jay® cushion) are made of a combination of either a) foam and an air-holding membrane or b) foam and a viscous fluid. They achieve stability through good envelopment while effectively distributing pressure (Trefler et al., 1993, p. 268). These specialized seat cushions also have dampening characteristics that allow for shock and vibration absorption. Unfortunately, if it is cold in the tractor cab, it takes some time for the viscous fluid to warm up and disperse.
  • The most common type of seat cushion is made of multi-layered honeycomb (e.g., the Stimulite® cushion). This type of cushion provides internal contouring for uniform load distribution, pelvis stability, proper leg positioning, and excellent shock absorption and stability over rough terrain. The use of perforated honeycomb provides excellent ventilation and allows moisture to evaporate (Willkomm, 1997a).

Regardless of what cushion is selected for pressure management, the overall height of the operator positioned in the tractor seat must be considered. To prevent hitting the ceiling of the cab, the tractor seat should be lowered to allow for sufficient head clearance but not so low as to cause the operator’s seat to bottom out when traveling over rough terrain. A clearance of approximately 15 cm (6 in.) between the operator’s head and the cab ceiling is recommended (Hansson, 1991, p. 10).

The additional cushion will also change the height of the backrest. Following the recommended back height support for wheelchair users with the same level of function, the height of the backrest should be 1.27 cm – 2.54 cm (.5 in. – 1.0 in.) below the scapulae (sidebar) (Cook & Hussey, 1995, p. 298). For farmers with high-level SCI, such as C4 and C5 (sidebar), a higher seat back is needed to support all or part of the scapulae and to accommodate for less trunk control (Cook & Hussey, 1995, p. 298).

[Back to Top]

Summary

In addition to all of the above suggestions, an evaluation/consultation by a qualified seating specialist is recommended. These individuals include physical and occupational therapists with advanced training in seating and positioning for individuals with spinal cord injuries. Their input and pressure mapping equipment can be useful in seat cushion selection as well as recommendations on how the tractor seat angles should be adjusted to maximize function and reduce potential secondary injuries.

Proper seating and positioning are critical to enabling farmers with SCI to operate a tractor effectively and to prevent secondary injuries. Although this document focuses on operators with SCI, use of more generalized ergonomic guidelines for tractor seating can benefit all tractor operators. The level and severity of the SCI will determine the specific adaptations that will be required. Modifications made to an existing tractor seat could affect co-workers’ ability to properly and safely operate that tractor. Therefore, if possible, all custom seat modifications should be easily removed so as not to interfere with co-workers’ effective tractor operation.

[Back to Top]

Resources:

http://www.agrabilityproject.org/search/index.cfm

[Back to Top]

References:

Cook A. M. & S. M. Hussey. 1995. Assistive Technologies: Principles and Practice. St. Louis, MO: Mosby-Year Book, Inc.

Fergusson-Pell, M. 1990. Seat cushion selection. Journal of Rehabilitation, Resource Development and Clinical Supplies, No. 2, Choosing a wheelchair system, 49-72.

Hansson J. 1991:1 Ergonomic Checklist for Tractors and Agricultural Machinery, The National Swedish Institute of Occupational Health, NIOH 1991.

Shields, R. K. & T. M. Cook. 1988. Effect of seat angle and lumbar support on seated buttock pressure. Physical Therapy. 68(11):1682-1686.

Trefler, E., D. Hobson, S. Johnson Taylor, L. Monahan, & G.C. Shaw. 1993. Seating and Mobility for Persons with Physical Disabilities: Therapy Skill Builders.

Wilder D., M.L. Magnussen, J. Fenwick, & M. Pope. 1994. The effect of posture and seat suspension design on discomfort and back muscle fatigue during simulated truck driving. Applied Ergonomics: 25(2): 66-76.

Willkomm, T. 1997. Risks in using modified tractors by operators with spinal cord injuries and their co-workers. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.

Willkomm, T. 1997a. Unpublished data collected related to tractor seating and spinal cord injuries.









 

[Back to Top]

NOTE: Mention or display of a trademark, proprietary product, or firm in text or figures does not constitute an endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Easter Seals, the University of Wisconsin, or the AgrAbility Project, and does not imply approval to the exclusion of other suitable products or firms.

The AgrAbility Project is administered by the U.S. Department of Agriculture CSREES. Funding for this document was provided under project number 00-41590-0932.